Legal Opinion

Oak Grove Consolidated School District No. 9 v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 5, 1939No. 4-5585PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In 1937, the appellant school district obtained from the State Board of Education a loan in the sum of $14,800 from the Revolving Loan Fund. Prior to obtaining the loan the electors of the district voted a continuing levy of' 7 mills against the property in the district subject to the tax, pursuant to the provisions of § 11553, Pope’s Digest.

Such loans are made for various periods of time, but for not more than 20 years, and are “secured by a mortgage or deed of trust executed to the state of Arkansas, State Commissioner of Education, and his successors in office, as trustee, . . .” The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horne v. Paragould Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Pledger v. CutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. Parsons v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Merritt v. M. W. Elkins Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Stuttgart v. McCuingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Houston School District No. 39 v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Cohn v. Dixon, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. City of Stuttgart v. McCuingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. City of Stuttgart v. McCuingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API