Legal Opinion

Matter of Ackerson, Karlen & Schmitt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1983No. 13832, 13833, 13834PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/CHRONOLOGY

September 15, 1981, the Aberdeen, South Dakota Police Chief and the Commissioner of Public Safety jointly notify appellees Ackerson, Schmitt, and Kar-len that appellees were terminated as Aberdeen police officers due to appel-lees’ involvement with marijuana. Within three days, appellees filed a notice of appeal with the Civil Service ' Board for the City of Aberdeen (Aberdeen Board).

September 18, 1981, appellees are notified that the South Dakota Law Enforcement Standards and Training Commission (State Commission) has revoked appellees’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dakota Harvestore Systems, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re the South Lincoln Rural Water System Application for Permit No. 4300-3South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Deuter v. South Dakota Highway PatrolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Declaratory Ruling Filed for Clay-Union Electric Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State, Division of Human Rights Ex Rel. Miller v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Application of Koch Exploration Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API