Legal Opinion

In Re the South Lincoln Rural Water System Application for Permit No. 4300-3

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1980No. 12997PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.

The circuit court upheld the decision of the South Dakota Water Rights Commission which granted water permit No. 4300-3 to South Lincoln Rural Water System. We affirm on appeal.

The Friends of Dakota Sandstone Aquifer will hereinafter be referred to as (appellants); the South Dakota Rural Water System as (appellees); and the South Dakota Water Rights Commission, presently known as the South Dakota Water Management Board, as the (Board).

On August 30, 1977, appellees submitted application No. 4135-3 for four cubic feet per second (cfs) of water to be withdrawn from the Dakota…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. South Dakota Public Utilities Commission v. Otter Tail Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Application of Am. State Bank, PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Empey v. Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State, Division of Human Rights Ex Rel. Miller v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Dakota Harvestore Systems, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API