Legal Opinion
Ashton v. Pierce
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 26, 1983No. Nos. 82-1988, 82-2048PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TAMM.
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the district court correctly held (1) that certain regulations promulgated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (the Department) are invalid because they *254are inconsistent with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4801-4846 (1976); (2) that the failure of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (the Secretary) to give notice of lead paint hazards to residents of post-1949 housing is unreviewable; and (3) that the Department has failed to fulfill…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- In Re Lead Paint LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- McNeill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Urban Developers LLC v. City of Jackson MSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Ayala v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.