Legal Opinion

Ayala v. Boston Housing Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 20, 1989PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.

Amy and Starsky Ayala, children under the age of seven, and their mother, Betty Ayala (plaintiffs), 2 brought an action against the defendant, Boston Housing Authority (BHA), for failing to inspect their apartment for lead paint hazards and for failing to enforce elimination of lead paint hazards. They alleged that the children were poisoned after they ingested lead paint in their apartment in Boston. A judge of the Boston Housing Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and reported certain questions to the Appeals Court. We granted direct appellate review. We vacate the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Alberts v. DevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Keene v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Loffredo v. Center for Addictive BehaviorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Speleos v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  4. MacKsey v. EganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Monahan v. Town of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API