Legal Opinion

Carrieri v. Bush

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1966No. 38071PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Appellant husband, James J. Carrieri, brought this action for alienation of affections against respondents Arnold J. Bush, Ralph E. Derkland, Michael Panteleeff, Norman Baxter and their wives. Trial was commenced before a jury. At the conclusion of appellant’s case, the trial court granted respondents’ challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. This appeal followed.

We reverse and remand the alienation of affections claim for trial., In evaluating the evidence adduced by appellant, it is axiomatic that

“A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, or a motion for nonsuit, admits the truth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Lankford v. TombariWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Stanley v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hughes v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Morris v. WarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tilton v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Janice Paul, A/k/a/ Janice Perez v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Guinn v. Church of Christ of CollinsvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API