Legal Opinion

Tilton v. Marshall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1996No. 94-1233PublishedCited by 439 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Chief Justice

in which GONZALEZ, HECHT, SPECTOR, OWEN, and ABBOTT, Justices, join and a plurality opinion as to the remaining portions of Section I in which SPECTOR, OWEN, and ABBOTT, Justices, join.

We grant relators’ motion for rehearing in part and withdraw our prior opinions and judgment, and substitute the following opinion in its place.1

Based on their constitutional rights, rela-tors complain that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to dismiss the claims of the plaintiffs in the underlying suit, or, at least, in ordering the production of certain allegedly protected documents. Because we…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by439 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Calvin Walker v. Beaumont Indep School DistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

434 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API