Hughes v. Holman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.
This is an action instituted by plaintiff: against the defendants to recover damages for the alleged alienation by defendants of the affections of plaintiff’s wife. Plaintiff, by his complaint, charges in substance that on or about the first day of November, 1919, the defendants entered into a conspiracy to alienate the affections of plaintiff’s wife from plaintiff and to disrupt plaintiff’s home and to destroy the peace and tranquillity thereof, and that the defendants, in furtherance of such conspiracy, did, by artifice, inducement, design and persuasion, alienate the affections of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Application of La DueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- De Vall v. De VallOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Pullen v. EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Spokane County v. Pacific Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Carrieri v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Cimijotti v. PaulsenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963
- Patterson v. SkoglundOregon Supreme Court · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.