Legal Opinion

Hilligoss v. Cross Companies

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1975No. 44998, 45089PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff leased an apartment from defendant for the period November 1,1971, to October 31,1972. Plaintiff was hospitalized from February 14 to February 25, 1972. From February 14 to February 18 the apartment was occupied by plaintiff’s father and plaintiff’s son. On February 21, defendant changed the locks on all of the apartment doors in the building and posted signs on each door indicating that the lock had been changed and that new keys could be acquired at the building office.

*547On February 25, plaintiff returned to the apartment to find the notice still on the door and several items of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Anderson v. TheisenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Wallinga v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Bass v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McLean v. Kirby Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Pietila v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Rum River Lumber Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Spitzak v. Hylands, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API