Legal Opinion
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1985No. CO-84-931PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Appellant Independent School District No. 14 (ISD) of Fridley, Minnesota, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting, at the close of all of the evidence, the motion of respondents AMPRO Corp., Por-tapit Division (AMPRO), and United Foam Corp. (United Foam) for a directed verdict. AMPRO and United Foam filed a notice of review with this court, seeking review of the trial court’s pretrial denial of their motion to substitute the Insurance Company of North America for ISD as a named party. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On November 19, 1979, a fire occurred in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. PerranoskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tapemark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Blair v. EspelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Willmar Poultry Co. v. Carus Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Timothy Gamradt Carla Gamradt v. Federal Laboratories, Inc. MacE Securities International Defense Technology Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Riewe v. ArnesenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Gray v. DerderianDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
- Krein v. RaudaboughCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.