J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
This suit was instituted by the appellee, who will hereinafter be designated plaintiff, against J. M. Radford Grocery Company, hereinafter styled Radford. Radford filed its answer and cross-action, in which it made Herbert Cockrell and C. C. Abbott, operating under the name of South Plains Coaches, Inc., parties defendant, and seeking recovery over against them, in the event the plaintiff recovered against it. Plaintiff then filed his amended petition, in which he made Abbott and Cockrell parties defendant (who will hereinafter be designated Abbott), along with Radford, and sought judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. MotwillerTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Hines v. ForemanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McWhirterTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- O'Connor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Markham v. Houston Direct Navigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. AndrewsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- West Texas Coaches, Inc. v. MadiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Bagley v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Abbott v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930