Legal Opinion
Dieter Hulsenbusch v. The Davidson Rubber Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1965No. 17785_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEHAFFY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant, Dieter Hulsenbusch, a citizen of West Germany, has appealed a decision of the District Court enjoining him from further breach of the employment contract he executed with his former employer and plaintiff below, The Davidson Rubber Company, Inc. of Dover, New Hampshire.
The Davidson Company is presently engaged in the manufacture primarily of interior automotive parts such as padded dashboards (crash pads), arm rests and sunvisors. Hulsenbusch’s business relationship with Davidson had its beginning in 1958 while he was employed as a technical consultant with…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Ferroline Corp. v. General AniLine & Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Hanson v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Industrial Electronics Corp. v. ClineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Basic Chemicals, Inc. v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. DingesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.