Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Glickman AKA Hal Glickman, United States of America v. James Rowe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1979No. 78-1087, 78-2498, 78-1391 and 78-2900PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRASK, Circuit Judge:
Harold Glickman and James Rowe appeal their convictions of one count each of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and of corruptly endeavoring to influence an officer of a court of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. The object of the conspiracy was to offer $50,000 to a federal district court judge to obtain favorable treatment in the sentencing or bail status of a defendant in a criminal prosecution then pending before the district court. They also appeal from the denial of their motions for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Alvin R. BustilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Adrian Norman PaysenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Reuben KrasnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Jeffrey Gaskins, AKA Jeffery GaskinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James E. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.