Legal Opinion

United States v. Adrian Norman Payseno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1986No. 85-3019PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRAND, District Judge:

This is an appeal from the defendant, Adrian N. Payseno’s conviction and sentence under Title II of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 894, 1 which establishes as a federal crime the collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means. Payseno raises five issues on appeal. We conclude that the district court committed plain error in failing to give a specific unanimity instruction and reverse the conviction; therefore, we do not address the remaining four issues.

FACTS

This case involves allegations of extortionate conduct in three separate cities:…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Dale Murray, Paul Leahey, Ronald Vanderbosch, Lawrence Tower, and Linton SherlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Uco Oil Company, and Donald SimeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Kevin J. SherbondyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States v. Joe S. Duncan and Michael M. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API