United States v. Adrian Norman Payseno
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STRAND, District Judge:
This is an appeal from the defendant, Adrian N. Payseno’s conviction and sentence under Title II of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 894, 1 which establishes as a federal crime the collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means. Payseno raises five issues on appeal. We conclude that the district court committed plain error in failing to give a specific unanimity instruction and reverse the conviction; therefore, we do not address the remaining four issues.
FACTS
This case involves allegations of extortionate conduct in three separate cities:…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Dale Murray, Paul Leahey, Ronald Vanderbosch, Lawrence Tower, and Linton SherlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Uco Oil Company, and Donald SimeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Kevin J. SherbondyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Joe S. Duncan and Michael M. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.