Legal Opinion

Scott v. Slater

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1953No. 32310PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to a strip of land lying between a tract formerly owned by them and one owned by defendants. They claim ownership of the strip by adverse possession and by the establishment of a boundary by acquiescence. The trial court found the facts in plaintiffs’ favor on each of these issues, and defendants, by this appeal, challenge those findings.

The area in which these tracts are located was platted. A street eighty feet in width was shown between them on the plat. Before either plaintiffs or defendants acquired their tracts, this street was vacated. When…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mugaas v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thomas v. HarlanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Skoog v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Beck v. LovelandWashington Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Merriman v. CokeleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Merriman v. CokeleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Lamm v. McTigheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Crites v. KochCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API