Legal Opinion
Merriman v. Cokeley
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 2010No. 83700-7PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
230 P.3d 162 (2010)
Scott MERRIMAN and Kim Merriman, husband and wife, Respondents,
v.
Paul COKELEY and Dianne Cokeley, husband and wife, Petitioners.
No. 83700-7.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Considered April 1, 2010.
Decided April 8, 2010.
Robert Kinney Valz, Jr., Valz Houser Kogut & Barnes, P.S., Olympia, WA, for Petitioners.
Thomas F. Miller, Attorney at Law, Tumwater, WA, Jay Allan Goldstein, Carmen R. Rowe Hoogkamer, Jay A. Goldstein Law Office, P.L.L.C., Olympia, WA, for Respondents.
2Per curiam
¶ 1 Paul and Dianne Cokeley seek review of a Court of Appeals decision holding that Scott and Kim…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by46 opinions
- Department of Social & Health Services v. T.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- McCleary v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re the Personal Restraint of StensonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Gorre v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Lee v. KonradAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.