Legal Opinion

Squaw Mountain Cattle Co. v. Bowen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1991No. 90-86, 90-87PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

The minority shareholders in the Two Bar-Muleshoe Water Company (Muleshoe) brought this derivative action against the corporation’s majority stockholder and president, Springer Jones, his wife and their ranch corporation, Squaw Mountain Cattle Company, for converting corporate assets. The action resulted from Jones causing the bulk of a $1.25 million settlement from litigation to be distributed to himself and his relatives. The trial court found generally in the minority shareholders’ favor, but declined to assess punitive and exemplary damages. Both parties appeal.

We affirm…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Danculovich v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lynch v. Vickers Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Roth v. First Security Bank of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Weaver v. MitchellWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Noetzelmann v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. G.K. Alan Assoc., Inc. v. LazzariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API