Legal Opinion

Hillard v. Marshall

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1995No. 94-6PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice, Retired.

This action concerns title to a nine-acre tract of land which was fenced in by the plaintiffs predecessor in interest. Earl Hil-lard (Hillard) appeals from the district court’s denial of his claim of title to the nine acres by virtue of adverse possession and quieting title in the defendants, Thomas and Barbara Dennison.

Hillard presents four issues for our consideration:

1. Did the District Court err by denying Appellant a presumption that Appellant’s possession of a nine (9) acre tract of land was adverse where Appellant actually occupied the tract under a mistaken…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Rock Springs v. Police Protection Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Doenz v. GarberWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Casper Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Commission of the Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Braunstein v. Robinson Family Ltd. Partnership LLPWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Davis v. ChadwickWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hovendick v. RubyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dorsett v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API