Legal Opinion

People v. Price

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1972No. Crim. 20566PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

Defendant was charged with kidnaping for the purpose of robbery (Pen. Code, § 209), and robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). It was alleged that he was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the offenses. Defendant pled not guilty. His motion to dismiss under section 1382, subdivision 2 of the Penal Code was denied. The jury found defendant not guilty of kidnaping for the purposes of robbery, but found him guilty of false imprisonment (Pen. Code, § 236), and robbery (first degree). The jury found defendant to be armed. Defendant was sentenced for the term…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. RozeboomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. People v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. AlexanderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. JardineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. State v. BeattyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API