Legal Opinion

Farris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1909No. 4624PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for cattle theft, the punishment assessed being two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The alleged purchaser testified, in substance, that he bought from appellant the head of cattle in question as well as a cow at the same time. The yearling was claimed by Hamilton. The cow and yearling were running on the range at the time of the sale and purchase. Appellant sold the yearling to the witness as his property. The •identification of the animal is sufficient as belonging to Hamilton. Appellant did not introduce any evidence. It will be observed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Dale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Conger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. People v. AlexanderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Spivey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Cozine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API