People v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LOW, P. J.
Defendant Karen Arnetta Scott appeals from judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of being an accessory to robbery (Pen. Code, § 32). On appeal, defendant contends that (1) the trial court erred in failing to give CALJIC No. 17.01, sua sponte, to the jury; (2) the jury was improperly instructed that defendant could be convicted as an accessory rather than as a principal; and (3) the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We affirm.
I
Steven Jackson, defendant’s brother-in-law, robbed a Barclay’s Bank in San Mateo. As Jackson walked toward the door with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. Vela PradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. McIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. GarewalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.