Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Casio PhoneMate, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 18, 2000No. 98 C 6250PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Philip Jackson has filed a complaint against defendants Casio PhoneMate, Inc., Asahi Corp., and Casio Computer Co., Ltd., alleging patent infringement. Defendant Casio PhoneMate (“defendant”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. 1
FACTS
Plaintiff owns United States Patent No. 4,596,900 (“the ’900 patent”). Plaintiffs invention enables a user to remotely control many functions of an appliance or device by using the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Economy Folding Box Corp. v. Anchor Frozen Foods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Jackson v. Casio PhoneMate, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- SRAM Corp. v. AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Economy Folding Box v. Anchor Frozen FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008