Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Casio PhoneMate, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 17, 2001No. 98 C 6250PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Philip Jackson has filed a complaint against defendants Casio PhoneMate, Inc., Asahi Corp., and Casio Computer Co., Ltd., alleging patent infringement. Defendant Casio PhoneMate (“defendant”) has filed a second motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. 1 For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is granted.
FACTS
Plaintiff is the owner of United States Patent No. 4,596,900 (“the ’900 patent”). Plaintiffs invention is a device that, when connected to an appliance or other electrical device, enables a user to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SuperGuide Corp. v. DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Gyrodata Inc. v. Gyro Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009