Legal Opinion
SRAM Corp. v. AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 9, 2001No. 00 C 6675, 01 C 0062PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
In these consolidated cases, SRAM Corporation has sued defendant AD-II Engineering, Inc., for infringement of patent no. 5,996,000 (the “000 patent”), and AD-II has sued SRAM for a declaration that AD-II is not infringing the 000 patent. 1 AD-II has moved for summary judgment on its claim of noninfringement. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Facts
Since 1988 SRAM has made and sold twist shifters for use on derailleur-equipped bicycles under the trade name Grip Shift. The grip shift is a way of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SRAM Corp. v. AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- SRAM Corp. v. AD-II Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004