Legal Opinion
Frey v. Security Insurance Company of Hartford
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 13, 1971No. Civ. A. 69-645PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, Chief Judge.
In this diversity contract case, tried to a jury, judgment was entered on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Vernon G. Frey, in the amount of $11,275, with interest from September 11, 1967. The defendant, Security Insurance Company of Hartford, moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial. It is our opinion that the defendant’s motions should be denied.
The defendant, Security Insurance Company of Hartford, the successor by merger to the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, was the plaintiff’s liability insurance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Meierdierck v. MILLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Unverzagt v. PresteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Curran v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Hughes v. Central Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Jeannette Glass Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gerrity Oil & Gas Corp. v. MagnessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Vernon G. Frey v. Security Insurance Company of Hartford, Successor by Merger to the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a Corporation (Amended-2/24/70)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Lathrop v. Safeco Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- Lathrop v. Safeco Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.