Legal Opinion
Yastrab v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 25, 2016No. Case No. 5:14-cv-01974-EJDPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*975ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge
Steve Jobs described the iPhone 4 as “the biggest leap since the original iPhone.” First Am. Compl, (“FAC”),, Dkt. No. 38, at ¶52. But for Plaintiffs David Yastrab, John Keller, Daniel Arrellano, Penelope Shaw, Evelyn Cortez, Stanley Williams and Michael Robins (collectively), (“Plaintiffs”), their purchase of the later-released iPhone 4s constituted a leap into functional obsolescence. They allege in this putative class action that the Bluetooth and Wi-Fi capabilities of their iPhones were “grayed out,”…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- In re Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Barrett v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.