Legal Opinion

Taylor v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1989No. Docket 111259PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a wrongful death action. Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order denying his motion to amend the complaint and an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant on the basis of governmental immunity. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff’s decedent, a ten-year-old boy, was electrocuted when he and severed other youths entered an electrical substation located in an abandoned section of a housing project owned by defendant city. Plaintiff and decedent, his son, were residents of the housing project. The substation was a brick structure with a single access door…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hyde v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Reardon v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bluemer v. Saginaw Central Oil & Gas Service, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Muilenberg v. Upjohn Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Maskery v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Herman v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Price v. Long Realty, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Adam v. Sylvan Glynn Golf CourseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Brown v. Genesee County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API