Fehringer v. F. H. Martin Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to El Paso District Court. — Hon. J. W. Sheafor, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
In order to constitute an estoppel by judgment pleaded as a bar to a second action it must appear that the same identical question was in issue in the former action between the same parties, or their privies, and determined by the judgment therein; Hickey v. Anheuser Bush Brewing Association, 36 Colo. 386, 85 Pac. 838; Water Supply & S. Co. v. Larimer & W. R. Co., 25 Colo. 87, 53 Pac. 386; City of Denver v. Lobenstein, 3 Colo. 216, Williams v. Hacker, 16 Colo. 113, 26 Pac. 143. The judgment so pleaded, however, will not operate as an estoppel unless it appears either upon the face of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mills v. HartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Water Supply & Storage Co. v. Larimer & Weld Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Hickey v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Williams v. HackerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- North Poudre Irrigation Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Albertson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. BrainardMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Kingsbury v. VreelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Youngquest v. YoungquestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.