Kingsbury v. Vreeland
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court.—Hon. Greeley W. Whitford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
As no bill of exceptions has been preserved, our consideration of alleged errors must be limited to matters covered by the record proper. This action was instituted in the District Court of the City and County of Denver to recover a part of the purchase price, etc., for an automobile sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, also for services and expenses alleged to have been rendered and incurred in connection therewith. Judgment was in favor of the plaintiff.
It is claimed that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to change the place of trial to Sum-*214mil county,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kirby v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Rice v. BushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Forbes v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Denver, South Park & Pacific Railroad v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Richards v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- North Poudre Irrigation Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Slinkard v. JordanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Lamon v. ZampSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Scheller v. MawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Van Kleeck-Bacon Investment Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.