Legal Opinion

Youngquest v. Youngquest

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 28, 1938No. 14,283PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

William O. Youngquest departed this life December 21, 1935. May Youngquest, plaintiff in error, was appointed administratrix of his estate by the county court of the City and County of Denver December 27, 1935. In the American National Bank of Denver at the time of Youngquest’s death was a cheeking account of $5,800, which, because of certain circumstances to be mentioned, was carried on the bank’s records as the joint account of deceased and Bell Youngquest, the defendant in error, to whom we shall refer as claimant. Shortly after her appointment the administratrix, in an ex parte…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Davis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Grand Valley Irrigation Co. v. Fruita Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Grimes v. BarndollarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kortz v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. D. A. C. Uranium Co. v. BentonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
  3. Prospero Associates v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  4. Benson v. BottgerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Kortz v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API