Albertson v. Clark
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action for attorney fees. Judgment for plaintiff. . Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Defendant in error, a lawyer was employed in that capacity in two causes, known respectively as “The Berkowitz Case” and “The Mason Case,” and upon the termination of the litigation brought separate suits for his fee in each. The former came to this court for final determination and was decided here November 3, 1919. Albertson v. Clark, 67 Colo. 477, 185 Pac. 256. The latter is the one now before us. The parties are designated as in the trial court.
*130Plaintiff sued for $10,000. The cause was tried to a jury and upon its verdict judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $4000. To review…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gardner v. BuckbeeNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Hallack v. StockdaleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Fehringer v. F. H. Martin Drug Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Williams v. HackerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Zall Jewelry Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kortz v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Fort v. BietschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- London v. AllisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Denver Land Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.