Legal Opinion
Azurite Corp. Ltd. v. Amster & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 2, 1994No. 89 Civ. 0746 (SS)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Azurite Corp. Ltd. (“Azurite”) brings this action to recover damages from corporate defendant Lafer, Amster & Co., now Amster & Co. (hereinafter “LACO”), and its officers Arnold Marvin Amster (“Am-ster”), Barry Stuart Lafer (“Lafer”) and Joel Richard Packer (“Packer”) (together “defendants”) for violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (the “Act”) of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Defendants move for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and for sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Vito Milanese, Jr. And Suzanne Milanese v. Rust-Oleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Republic National Bank v. HalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Islamic Society of Fire Department Personnel v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- HCC, Inc. v. R H & M MacHine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.