Legal Opinion

HCC, Inc. v. R H & M MacHine Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 1999No. 96 CIV. 4920(PKL)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

' LEISURE, District Judge.

This action involves allegations that defendants have infringed plaintiffs patent regarding a hydraulic, towable backhoe. Before the Court are defendants’ objections to a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) issued by the Honorable Ronald L. Ellis, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending denial of a motion by defendant R H & M Machine Co. (“R H & M”) for leave to interpose an additional defense and counterclaim concerning the patent.

For the reasons stated in this Opinion and Order, the Report is rejected and defendant R H & M’s motion for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Regions Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Raymond Keith Foster, Keith Mfg. Co., and Keith Sales, Co. v. Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Olof A. HallstromCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hall v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Pedro v. Armour Swift-EckrichDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  3. Eastern America Trio Products, Inc. v. Tang Electronic Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Stonecrest Partners, LLC v. Bank of Hampton RoadsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011
  5. Republic National Bank v. HalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API