Legal Opinion
Ryan Cox v. CoinMarketCap OpCo LLC, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 17, 2026No. 3:21-cv-08197Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ryan Cox, No. CV-21-08197-PCT-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 CoinMarketCap OpCo LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The Court now considers Defendant BAM Trading Services Inc. d/b/a 16 Binance.US’s (“BAM”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 106) and Defendant CoinMarketCap 17 OpCo., LLC’s (“CMC”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 107). The Motions have been fully 18 briefed. For the following reasons, the Court grants BAM’s and CMC’s Motions. The 19 Court gives Plaintiff leave to amend their Amended Complaint. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.