Legal Opinion
Holt v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 8, 2013PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.
This is the second set of direct appeals to this Court arising out of the work of the 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission (“LRC”) of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
*1214Previously, we filed a per curiam order on January 25, 2012, and declared that the legislative redistricting plan filed by the LRC on December 12, 2011 (the “2011 Final Plan”), was contrary to law under Article II, Section 17(d) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, and in accordance with the directive in that constitutional provision, we remanded the matter to the LRC to reapportion the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Karcher v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Moore, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. RamosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In Re Petition to Submit Ballot Question to Concord Township VotersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.