Karcher v. Daggett
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The question presented by this appeal is whether an apportionment plan for congressional districts satisfies Art. I, §2, of the Constitution without need for further justification if the population of the largest district is less than one percent greater than the population of the smallest district. A three-judge District Court declared New Jersey’s 1982 reapportionment plan unconstitutional on the authority of Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U. S. 526 (1969), and White v. Weiser, 412 U. S. 783 (1973), because the population deviations among districts, although small, were not the result of a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by346 opinions
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bush v. VeraSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.