Legal Opinion

Vieth v. Jubelirer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 2004No. 02-1580PublishedCited by 385 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Scalia

Plaintiffs-appellants Richard Vieth, Norma Jean Vieth, and Susan Furey challenge a map drawn by the Pennsylvania General Assembly establishing districts for the election of congressional Representatives, on the ground that the dis-tricting constitutes an unconstitutional political gerrymander.1 In Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U. S. 109 (1986), this Court held that political gerrymandering claims are justiciable, but *272could not agree upon a standard to adjudicate them. The present appeal presents the questions whether our decision in Bandemer was in error, and, if not, what the standard should be.

I

The…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by385 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Lane v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Gill v. WhitfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

380 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API