Legal Opinion

East/West Venture v. Wurmfeld Associates, P.C.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 11, 1989No. 88 Civ. 7459 (RPP)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Defendant Wurmfeld Associates, P.C. (Wurmfeld), an architectural firm, moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), to dismiss the complaint in this action for declaratory relief. Defendant contends the complaint fails to state a proper claim and to set forth an actual controversy.

Wurmfeld was the creator of eight sets of architectural plans (the Wurmfeld Plans) which were prepared for the development of a real estate parcel located in Fort Lee, New Jersey (the Property). The Wurmfeld Plans were registered with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Wembley, Inc. v. Superba Cravats, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Demetriades v. KaufmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. WPOW, Inc. v. MRLJ ENTERPRISESDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. Joseph J. Legat Architects, P.C. v. United States Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John G. Danielson, Inc. v. Winchester-Conant Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Innovative Networks, Inc. v. Satellite Airlines Ticketing Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. CSM Investors, Inc. v. Everest Development, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  4. Fusco v. Rome Cable Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
  5. Gilbert, Segall and Young v. Bank of MontrealDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API