Legal Opinion
Gilbert, Segall and Young v. Bank of Montreal
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1992No. 91 Civ. 3724 (SWK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gilbert, Segall and Young (“GSY”) instituted this action for a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 for the purpose of determining its liability under a lease of commercial office space if it vacates the premises prior to the expiration of the term of the lease and makes no future rental payments to defendant Bank of Montreal (the “Bank”). The Bank moves to dismiss GSY’s complaint, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(c), on the ground that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coffman v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fusco v. Rome Cable Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Siedlik v. Stanley Works, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Harbor Distributing Corp. v. GTE Operations Support Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Bath Petroleum Storage, Inc. v. SovasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- People v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.