Legal Opinion
C. L. McMahon, Inc. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 4, 1941No. 30150PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action by R. T. Smith, plaintiff, against C. L. Mc-Mahan, Inc., defendant, for damages to livestock by pollution. From a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Defendant’s sole contention is that the trial court erred in giving instruction No. 4, which is as follows:
“You are instructed that under the statutory law of this state it is provided that: ‘No inflammable product from any oil or gas well shall be permitted to run into any tank, pool or stream used for watering stock; and all waste of oil and refuse from tanks or wells shall be drained into proper receptacles…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Comanche Drilling Co. v. Shamrock Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Owen-Osage Oil & Gas Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Devonian Oil Corporation Ration v. HurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka R. Co. v. RiddleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Marathon Oil Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burton v. HarnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- C. L. McMahon, Inc. v. LentzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- George L. White v. Coy H. Rose, Also Known as Coy N. Rose, Individually, and Doing Business as Rose Feed Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- George L. White v. Coy H. Rose, Also Known as Coy N. Rose, Individually, and Doing Business as Rose Feed Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957