Legal Opinion

C. L. McMahon, Inc. v. Lentz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1943No. 30488PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been caused to livestock and domestic water supply by the pollution of a stream with salt water. The defendant denied liability and by plea in confession and avoidance alleged that it had exercised every effort to prevent the escape of salt water from its premises, and that if any salt water had escaped, it had done so despite the best efforts of the defendant to prevent it. Upon the issues so…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Texas Co. v. MosshamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Comanche Drilling Co. v. Shamrock Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Owen-Osage Oil & Gas Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. C. L. McMahon, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. SharpensteenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Tomlinson v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Tomlinson v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API