Legal Opinion
George L. White v. Coy H. Rose, Also Known as Coy N. Rose, Individually, and Doing Business as Rose Feed Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1957No. 5409_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, George L. White, a cattle rancher in southwestern Colorado, bought from a retail dealer in Colorado a quantity of prepared livestock feed which had been manufactured and packaged by the defendant in Kansas. The product contained approximately 7 % elemental sulphur and protein, neither of which, used alone, is harmful to cattle. Plaintiff fed the product to his cattle as directed and a short time thereafter thirty-three head of them died. He brought this action to recover damages. The case was tried to the court without a jury and judgment was entered for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Loop v. . LitchfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Hoskins v. Jackson Grain Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Deacon v. American Plant Food Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- George L. White v. Coy H. Rose, Also Known as Coy N. Rose, Individually, and Doing Business as Rose Feed Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957