Legal Opinion

Robinson v. McReynolds

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 24, 1988No. 11492-5-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

A jury awarded Ross and Jeanne Robinson $29,000 on their Consumer Protection Act claim against Virgil Adams Real Estate, Inc. The claim was based on representations allegedly made by Adams's agent, John Drew, concerning commercial real estate that the Robin-sons had purchased. The principal issue in Adams's appeal is whether sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that Drew's representations constituted an unfair or deceptive practice in violation of the act. We affirm, holding the evidence sufficient. We also reject Adams's contentions that testimony about Drew's statements should…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nordstrom, Inc. v. TampourlosWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Haner v. Quincy Farm Chemicals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eagle Point Condominium Owners Ass'n v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Svendsen v. StockWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Svendsen v. StockWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API