Legal Opinion

Elton v. Anheuser-Busch Beverage Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1996No. E015173PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

The prevailing plaintiffs in an action for damages to real property appeal (1) the trial court’s order taxing their costs by denying their request for attorney’s fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.9 and (2) the resulting judgment which offsets the defendant’s costs against the plaintiffs’ damage award, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998, subdivision (e). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings regarding attorney’s fees and other costs.

Factual and Procedural Background

To reduce the risk of fire to its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  3. Quarterman v. KefauverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Lozada v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Starrh and Starrh Cotton Growers v. Aera Energy LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API