Legal Opinion

State v. Leming

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 11, 2006No. 32843-7-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1 Paul W. Leming appeals his convictions for assault in violation of a court order, second degree assault, felony harassment, and the jury’s special verdict finding that these convictions involved domestic violence. He argues that (1) double jeopardy precluded these multiple convictions because both the felony harassment and the assault in violation of a court order were incidental to the second degree assault; (2) the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the felony harassment charge for lack of sufficient evidence; (3) the trial court erred in failing to find that assault in violation…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. State v. MANDANASCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. GaworskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. City of Auburn v. HedlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. MurawskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API