State v. Murawski
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — The State charged Barby Murawski with theft in the first degree before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington1 rendered Washington’s procedures for imposing exceptional sentences unconstitutional. She pleaded guilty after RCW 9.94A.537, a statute intended to bring Washington law into compliance with Blakely, became effective. This appeal results from the State’s repeated efforts to constitutionally obtain an exceptional sentence against Murawski during this period when the law was unsettled. The State argues that the sentencing court erroneously refused to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BerrierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. MurawskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007