Legal Opinion

Celestino Silva-Calderon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 2004No. 02-73474PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

We grant Petitioner’s Petition for Rehearing. The opinion filed February 23, 2004, and appearing at 358 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir.2004), ■ is .withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.

We previously held in this case that we lacked jurisdiction to review Petitioner Silva — Calderon’s two procedural due process challenges — one relating to a decision of an Immigration Judge (“U”) refusing to grant a subpoena, and the other relating to the IJ’s denial of a continuance. We reached the conclusion that we were without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. VERGARABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  3. Celestino Silva-Calderon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caplash v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
  2. Valdez-Camacho v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Benites v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Fernandez-Cabrera v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Hernandez-Alvarado v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API