Legal Opinion
Celestino Silva-Calderon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 23, 2004No. 02-73474PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether we have jurisdiction to review procedural due process claims that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) could have competently and effectively considered, but that Petitioner advances for the first time on appeal.
I
Petitioner Celestino Silva-Calderon (“Silva”) asks us to review the BIA’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Silva urges that a hearing before the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) offended due process and denied him a full and fair hearing because the IJ declined to grant a continuance, and because the IJ declined to issue a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jose Cruz Romero-Torres v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- J. Jesus Torres-Aguilar v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Juan Cesar Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sokha Sun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert Coleman, District Director of InsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lucila Avendano-Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Celestino Silva-Calderon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004