Legal Opinion

Valdez-Camacho v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2004No. 01-71517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Sijifredo Valdez-Camaeho petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) ordering him removed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), which makes an alien removable for having committed an aggravated felony. “Aggravated felony” is defined under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A) to include “sexual abuse of a minor.” Valdez-Camacho argues that he has not been convicted of an “aggravated felony” under § 1101(a)(43)(A).

Under the “categorical approach” laid out in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990), “[t]he crime defined…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Rafael Baron-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Esly Pereira-SalmeronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Segura-VirgenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API