Legal Opinion
VERGARA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1975No. ID 2408PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim DecisiOn #2408 MA.TTER OF VERGARA In Deportation Proceedings A-20527143 Decided by Board July 15, 1975 The immigration judge's refusal to issue a subpoena requiring respondent's father to testify in conjunction with a claim to United States citizenship which she began to explore during the course of deportation proceedings, did not result in a denial of due process since the whereabouts of the father was unknown and there was considerable uncertainty as to obtaining his testimony at all, and the issuance of the subpiena would require a further substantial delay in the proceedings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reid v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Manuel Mendez and Teresa Lastra De Mendez v. H. I. Major, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Dominador S. Perdido and Melva Pating Liguigan Perdido v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Mary Moore Aalund v. E. Dewitt Marshall, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Susan M. Faustino, an Infant Under the Age of 14 Years, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Albano Vieira v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travis Murphy v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Celestino Silva-Calderon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Celestino Silva-Calderon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jose Sarabia-Lopez v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015